Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
Tara H.
Aris S.
5/13/10
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Alper M. and Cristian C. 8th grade honors.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
Good, it made sense and had easy content and problems.
• Was it easy to understand?
It was a tiny bit difficult to read the content,
And the words against the background.
Did it grab your attention?
Yes, their power point was interesting and fun sort of like a game. But you are learning, about something.
• What did you think of the graphics?
I liked the graphics very much; they were fun and caught my attention.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Yes it did, if I was new to learning about box and whiskers then I would at least try this power point out.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
I would change the color of the words so that others don’t have any trouble reading it.
• What was the best part of the site?
I like the part where it has all the buttons to go to the other parts of the website.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
I would make the names on the title page, because it is a little hard or difficult to see their names, at least for me it is.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes I think that they made all the requirements.
• What section did they do the best on?
I think that the first page or the directory page, because it is clear and easy to find what you are looking for.
• What section did they need to improve on?
I would make the names on the title page, because it is a little hard or difficult to see their names, at least for me it is.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
I would grade it an A+, I would give them an A because it looks like they put a lot of time and effort into it.
TM
8th grade: Ashley N. and Sina R. had an excellent power point. They had amazing picture example and used words that everybody could understand. I was very pleased with their colors design and organization. They only thing I didn’t like was that they kind of dragged things out.
1. WO and JD 6th grade
2. a. There wasn’t a whole lot of math, but it was correct
b. It was easy to understand, but there wasn’t a lot of explanation
3. a. I thought that it was very creative, and the graphics were good and probably took a really long time.
b. I thought that the best part was the penguin thing saying, “hahaha” at the end.
c. I think that the writing could have been neater, even though it’s hard to do.
4. My only suggestion is to make the information more detailed and just have my info in general because it’s meant to help students, and it would help more if there were more examples.
5. I don’t think it followed the rubric well because there was no vocab, standards, practice, or anything.
6. I would give it a C because it was good but didn’t follow the rubric.
TM
8th grade honors: Cl and AG had a better than average power point. They had good examples and good colors. They used good words in there very detailed explanations. I didn’t understand the concept very well because I am not at that level but I followed along well enough. The only bad thing was organization.
TD
The authors of this presentation are alper m and cristian c. The quality of this content is very good. The authors also made this concept seem very easy and understandable. The graphics of this site were very good, they included many things that made it fun and interesting. This site made me want to learn about this concept. The only suggestion I would give the authors is to change some font colors so the writing is easier to read. I would give this presentation an a because of how good they did.
AR
8th grade honors: AJ and CD had a very easy to work and understandable website. Everything needed was there and simple to get to. Practice problems were the best part since they had a lot. Some of the vocabulary words didn’t have clear definitions so examples for those would help. I say a very solid A.
A.M. and C.C. did a good job. It is hard to find the page changer thing though. It is easy to read but I don’t understand it because I have not learned it yet. The animation grabbed my attention big time. They followed the rubric. I give them an A-.
J.M.
AM
Who are you talking about?
• AJ and CD 8th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• good
• yes
Did it grab your attention?
• good
• yes
What suggestions do you have?
• none
• the pictures
• the overall neatness
What about the rubric?
• yes
• citing
• the lesson
What grade would you give you site?
• B because it wasn’t the most amazing website ive ever seen
Who are you talking about?
• AC
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was nice and challenging.
• Was it easy to understand?
Yes, after you read the explanations.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
Theyre weren’t really graphics, each slide was a different color but it lacked excitement.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Yes, just to see if I would’ve been successful after reading his instructions.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Add more graphics/color.
• What was the best part of the site?
The graphs.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
Just the graphics.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes,
• What section did they do the best on?
Graphs and explanations..
• What section did they need to improve on?
Just the graphics.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A, the graphics were the only thing I could think of that needed improvement
8th Grade Honors
Who are you talking about?
• CL EG
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was good.
• Was it easy to understand?
The wording was a little bit confusing but it was decent.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
There weren’t any.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
Not really.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Add more color, other than that it was great.
• What was the best part of the site?
The index.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
Just the graphics
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes
• What section did they do the best on?
Index
• What section did they need to improve on?
Nothing, the graphics don’t really count as a section, the math was understandable.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A, the math and explanations were easily understandable.
SD
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
EG and CL (8th Grade Honors)
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
• Was it easy to understand?
The math looked and was easy to understand.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
We thought your graphics were very nice. We think it would be nice to add more though.
Yes, because it was explained in a way that we could understand.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
• What was the best part of the site?
• What part of the site needed improvement?
We suggest that you should add some more pictures and more colors.
The best part was the slides that explained how to find the answer to radicals using adding, subtraction, multiplying, and dividing, because it provided a lot of information.
We think the title page needed more improvement. It would be nice if you had a more colorful title page.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
• What section did they do the best on?
• What section did they need to improve on?
Yes, you followed the rubric.
They did the best on the Lesson section. It had a lot of helpful information.
We think you guys need to improve the lesson of the power point a little more. It would be nice if it had more pictures and colors.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A, because it meets all the requirements, the layout looks really nice, and you provided a lot of information on your topic.
aw sa bkb
Ashley L. and Sina R.
8th grade Honors Evaluation
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.\
- AM and CC. 8th grade Honors
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
-
• Was it easy to understand?
- Yes, it was easy to understand but the background was very distracting and hard to read some of there sections.
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
- The graphics were really good but the background of there website was really distracting and made some of the graphics hard to see.
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
- Yes, it made us want to try math because they explained box and whiskers very well. They also showed good examples of box and whiskers plot.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
- We would tell them to probably make a background that didn’t have so much movement. We would also tell them to show a little more examples and put more pictures in.
• What was the best part of the site?
- The best part of the site was the part where they were talking about the “what is the box and whiskers plot” it was very descriptive and made you understand exactly what a box and whiskers plot is.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
- The part they need to improve on is the background. They need to make it so that the words are not hard to read. They also need to put why the site they used was important. They need to put in why it’s important to learn the topic.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
- Yes they did follow the rubric but they had some misspelled words. They also didn’t explain why the site they used was important. They didn’t include any real life examples.
• What section did they do the best on?
- They did well on the example problems but they could have added more. They also did good on the practice problems.
• What section did they need to improve on?
- The part they need to improve on is the background. They need to make it so that the words are not hard to read. They also need to put why the site they used was important. They need to put in why it’s important to learn the topic.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
- We would give them an A- because it was really hard to see some of the words they wrote down. But they did a really good job on explaining what they were teaching.
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
AM and CC
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
AMAZING!!!!
• Was it easy to understand?
Yes
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
TOTALLY AWESOME!!!
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
No
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Less explanations, it’s long and boring. Short and sweet please.
• What was the best part of the site?
EVERYTHING!!! IT WAS AMAZING!!!
• What part of the site needed improvement?
The explanation
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
Yes
• What section did they do the best on?
The practice problems
• What section did they need to improve on?
The explanation
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
A, for ‘awesomeness’
RT
8th grade honors: These 8th grade honors made a website by Alper M. and Cristian C. The content was good they made it easy to follow so you could understand what they were trying to teach. This website did grab my attention because the lesson was interesting and it made me want to do the problems. I suggest next time they make it easier to switch the pages it took me a few minutes to figure out what I had to do to switch the pages. They followed the rubric and did everything they were supposed to do and I give this project an A.
CB
AS and SA
1.) The math was okay. They did have some good explanations, but lots of the math was just example problems and definitions.
2.) The graphics were poor, and there were not many pictures.
3.) I would suggest making more colorful pictures.
4.) The best part of the site was all of the definitions.
5.) The part of the site that needs improvement is the presentation.
6.) For the most part they did follow the rubric.
7.) They did best on providing a list of vocabulary.
8.) The authors need to improve on their presentation skill.
I would give this project an A.
AJ and CD
8th Grade Honors
Alexis L.
1.) I think the content of this website was very straightforward and easy to understand. It kept me very engaged and I learned a lot.
2.) Yes this website grabbed my attention. It looked very interesting at the beginning with the Darth Vader picture which very so made me want to check out the rest of the page.
3.) I really have no suggestions since the website was straight foward and hit all the points.
4.) Yes they did follow the rubric. They hit all points and made everything easy to understand.
5.) The grade I would give them would be an A. They did everything they were supposed to do.
CB
EG and CL
1.) The quality of the math was very good and it was easy to understand. The simple explanations made it easy even for me to understand.
2.) The graphics were very nice; the lack of pictures was made up for by the slick presentation.
3.) I would suggest having more pictures.
4.) The best part of the site was the included index.
5.) I couldn’t find a part that needed improvement.
6.) Form what I saw they did follow the entire rubric.
7.) They did best on the clean explanations.
8.) I don’t think that they need to improve at all
E.E.W.
1. 8th grade A.M. and C.C.
2. The math was great. It was short and sweet, and easy and simple to understand.
3. The graphics were really cool, and not too distracting. It made me want to try it.
4. The best part was the graphics and content. They should work on having more information.
5. They followed the rubric really well. They did the best on lesson. The information was great, and very informing. They need to work on adding more information.
6. A. I think it was their personal best. Great job!!!!!!
A.W.
Who are you talking about?
• RW and JH 8th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• The quality of the math was very good because I could read everything and it was easy.
• It was very easy to understand because they explained it in great detail.
Did it grab your attention?
• I think the graphics were very good because it grabbed my attention.
• This website made me do the math because everything was interesting to me.
What suggestions do you have?
• My suggestion to the authors would be to have a previous page so I can go back.
• The best part of the website was the real life example because it showed me what would have to do in real life.
• The part of the website that needed improvement was how tos, because they really needed more information.
What about the rubric?
• They followed the rubric and nothing was missing of what I could see.
• The section I did the best on was the assessment part because they had good questions and the right answers to them.
• The section they needed improvement on was the lesson because they should have more than two pages of information on their topic.
What grade would you give you site?
• I would give them an A because they followed the rubric and the information was easy to understand.
ZB
Questions:
Who are you talking about?
• AJ and CD, 8th grade honors
What do you think of the content?
• The math was high quality
• The math was easy to understand because it was explained thoroughly
Did it grab your attention?
• The graphics were simple but still fun to look at.
• There were little pictures but the way the website was organized, I wanted to try the math.
What suggestions do you have?
• I would suggest different colors for the letters.
• The best part of the site was how organized it was.
• The lack of pictures could be improved.
What about the rubric?
• There needed to be more assessment questions.
• The lesson part of the rubric was filled out properly.
• The additional requirements could be filled out more.
What grade would you give you site?
• I would give the website an A because the lesson was well explained and all the material could be learned.
8th Grade Honors - Algebra
Who are you talking about?
• State the initials and grade level of the authors.
Alper M. and Cristian C.
What do you think of the content?
• How was the quality of the math?
It was hard to read.
• Was it easy to understand?
No
Did it grab your attention?
• What did you think of the graphics?
Do not follow math AT ALL
• Did it make you want to do math (or at least try it out)?
No not at all.
What suggestions do you have?
• What suggestions would you give to the authors?
Don’t add video game graphics..
• What was the best part of the site?
Nothing, I found this very hard to understand.
• What part of the site needed improvement?
Everything. They need to be more descriptive and follow more guide lines.
What about the rubric?
• Did they follow the rubric?
I cant tell,
• What section did they do the best on?
The practice problems I guess.
• What section did they need to improve on?
Most of their project.
What grade would you give you site?
• A – B – C – D – F (and why)?
D, they didn’t accomplish much, it was VERY hard to read and understand.
Post a Comment